As concerns grow over the mental well-being of young people, several countries are considering age-based restrictions on social media, sparking a global debate over risks, evidence, and regulation.
Push for Restrictions Gains Momentum
Countries including the United Kingdom and France are actively considering bans on social media use for children and young teenagers, following Australia’s recent decision to prohibit under-16s from accessing major platforms. The move has intensified debate over whether restricting social media is an effective way to address worsening mental health among young people.
Supporters of such bans argue that urgent action is needed as anxiety, depression, and emotional distress among adolescents continue to rise. Critics, however, caution that the scientific evidence remains mixed and warn against one-size-fits-all solutions.
Australia Sets a Precedent
Australia became the first country to introduce a nationwide ban on social media for users under 16, targeting platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube. Authorities there argue that early data already shows impact, with the country’s online safety watchdog reporting that technology companies have blocked around 4.7 million underage accounts since the policy was announced.
The Australian move has drawn international attention, particularly in Europe, where policymakers are closely monitoring the outcomes.
France and UK Explore Similar Measures
In France, lawmakers are debating proposals to ban social media for children under 15, including legislation supported by President Emmanuel Macron. In the UK, discussions have also gained traction, with reports that US psychologist Jonathan Haidt — a vocal supporter of restrictions — has briefed government officials.
Google’s New AI Tool ‘Nano Banana’ Takes Social Media by Storm
Haidt argues that excessive screen time, especially on social media, is reshaping children’s brains and fuelling a mental health crisis. His views, outlined in his book The Anxious Generation, have influenced policymakers but remain controversial among researchers.
Experts Divided on the Evidence
Some academics say social media’s impact, though sometimes small at an individual level, becomes significant when applied to billions of users. Australian researcher Michael Noetel suggests the cumulative harm justifies bold action, even if the evidence is not absolute.
France’s public health agency Anses recently concluded that social media contributes to mental health problems among adolescents — particularly girls — though it is not the sole cause.
Others urge caution. Studies indicate that both excessive use and total restriction can be harmful, with moderate use linked to better wellbeing. Critics also warn that outright bans may be easily bypassed and could shift responsibility away from parents.
Waiting for Clear Answers
Many experts now argue that Australia’s experience will serve as a crucial test case. Researchers say clearer evidence should emerge within a year, helping governments determine whether social media bans protect young people — or create new challenges.
